It is found that there is no definite stipulations to show whether the principal has faults or not is the constitution requirement of agency by estoppel.
但其中仍有一些方面规定得不尽合理,如关于被代理人有无过错是不是表见代理的构成条件没有明确规定,将表见代理范 围局限于"订立合同"过于狭小等。
If the default of the principal is necessary to be a prima facie agency, it should depend on the different situations of the prima facie agency.
对于表见代理是否应以被代理人过失为要件 ,应视构成表见代理的各种情形而定。
